![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
AAAARRRRRGGGGHHHHH.
I really do care about my state parks.
I really have an issue with the state budget being run by ballot measure.
I really do not like regressive taxing.
I really believe that, even if you don't visit parks, you, as an air breathing water drinking creature, benefit from them.
http://www.voterguide.sos.ca.gov/propositions/21/
"A YES vote on this measure means: An $18 annual surcharge would be added to the amount paid when a person registers a motor vehicle. The surcharge revenues would be used to provide funding for state park and wildlife conservation programs. Vehicles subject to the surcharge would have free admission and parking at all state parks."
"A NO vote on this measure means: State park and wildlife conservation programs would continue to be funded through existing state and local funding sources. Admission and parking fees could continue to be charged for vehicles entering state parks."
I really do care about my state parks.
I really have an issue with the state budget being run by ballot measure.
I really do not like regressive taxing.
I really believe that, even if you don't visit parks, you, as an air breathing water drinking creature, benefit from them.
http://www.voterguide.sos.ca.gov/propositions/21/
"A YES vote on this measure means: An $18 annual surcharge would be added to the amount paid when a person registers a motor vehicle. The surcharge revenues would be used to provide funding for state park and wildlife conservation programs. Vehicles subject to the surcharge would have free admission and parking at all state parks."
"A NO vote on this measure means: State park and wildlife conservation programs would continue to be funded through existing state and local funding sources. Admission and parking fees could continue to be charged for vehicles entering state parks."
Tags: