May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
11 1213141516 17
18 192021222324
25 262728293031

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Monday, November 3rd, 2014 07:19 am
Halloween evening Christine and i sat down and watched Frankenstein (1931) then the X-File episode Post-modern Prometheus.

The cognitive challenge for me was watching the 1931 episode and wonder, was it really a horror film when it came out? Did audiences identify the horror as the initial bullying? Or was all of that invisible to the sensibilities of the time? Was the identification of Victor Frankenstein as the monster immediate?

(Having not read the book, either, i wonder how many had read the book before seeing the film -- the loose derivation may be significant in distinguishing the interpretations of the characters.)

I note both Dracula (1897) and Frankenstein (1818) were epistolary: i wonder at the technique and whether that was just the thing at the time (although eighty years seems to argue against "at the time").

--==∞==--

The cleaning experience was good. I stayed and cleaned, too, although it was more clutter shifting than scrubbing. I ran laundry (a load of slip covers).

I've two more visits to use this year under the auspices of the Groupon. I wonder if they clean insides of refrigerators and shower curtains. And refrigerator coils.

--==∞==--

Yesterday we felt like we got the extra hour over and over: slept in, more afternoon time, more evening time! Waking up today i hardly notice it.

The challenge will be the darkness of homecoming.
Tuesday, November 4th, 2014 12:53 am (UTC)
Old films are fascinating.

I think the epistolary format sets the horror at a bit of a distance, as it lessens the feeling of "this is happening right now." Though the sections go on so long, one forgets it's part of a letter.

Napping plus the extra hour sounds so welcome for both of you! I'm glad you got added rest.
Thursday, November 6th, 2014 11:13 pm (UTC)
I like the idea of reading a diary or epistolary novel "in time."