elainegrey: Inspired by Grypping/gripping beast styles from Nordic cultures (Default)
Saturday, March 4th, 2023 10:41 am
One of the questions in the original form was "What's your favorite type of distraction? (Sports, memes, weird TikToks, celebrity gossip, baby pictures, puppies, you name it) " as well a question about food and drink items.

On-line, it seems that it should be easy to share media, although some media is pay-walled. It seemed on the surface of it that it would be easy to get a list of ways to share media etc with people but the more i thought about it, the more complicated it gets. Not everyone uses the same music services, streaming services, etc. I don't know that it is really that easy to give a month of some random streaming service. Just because you know an email for a person, doesn't mean it's the email that they use for some random service -- or that they want some random service to know.

Then it seemed impossible. I think of mismatches like venmo vs paypal, or Apple music vs Amazon music. Maybe there are easier ways? Or maybe with enough options it gets easier?

I started a list at https://airtable.com/shrk2j28yuCHo2360/tblQOm9vYTioDL4ZX and you can contribute anonymously at https://airtable.com/shr7LqW1wob21Gbjr

Another thing i thought of is engaging with one's creative efforts. "Read my fan fic" etc.
elainegrey: Inspired by Grypping/gripping beast styles from Nordic cultures (Default)
Saturday, March 4th, 2023 07:15 am
I'm continuing to think about https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSejOaU3pjaAELZ3ai032ubt24GYTEsDRw3F4zBd95N2-Vh2wA/viewform and https://annehelen.substack.com/p/a-shortcut-for-caring-for-others -- a care guide for one's self.

I'm thinking of a list of conditions that have prompted wanting to care, and i'm pondering an ontology:

It seems there might be four sorts of social bonding and care responses, that can be prompted by wanting to respond to someone's need or can simply be motivated by care:

"Thinking of you" - a communication that should not demand any reciprocal response

"Want to communicate with you" -- minimally an asynchronous exchange

"Want to spend time with you" -- a need to schedule a compatible time for synchronous connection

"Want to care for you" -- gift giving, other efforts to provide ease



"Thinking of you" and "Want to communicate with you" -- for the Dreamwidth/LiveJournal communities, this begins with "comment on a recent post" to DMs to contact via messaging services (or Facebook, Twitter) or text message or postal mail. There's a spectrum of trust in contact points. I'm pondering how a community form could be structured to help with communicating communication channels when there is varying levels of trust.

I think all of these have some element that work for distributed, internet mediated communities and a spectrum of trust. But. But. Here are some questions....





Poll #28579 Care form questions
This poll is anonymous.
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: Just the Poll Creator, participants: 5

My trust and privacy needs when it comes to communication channels

varies person to person, and could not be captured in a form
3 (60.0%)

is about the same for all on my "access list" or a "custom filter"
3 (60.0%)

i am happy to volunteer i like text messages and then ignore someone's request for my phone number if i don't want the requestor to have that contact
2 (40.0%)

i am happy to volunteer i like postal mail and then ignore someone's request for my address if i don't want the requestor to know where i live
1 (20.0%)

frustrates me that others can be so trusting and my need for safety makes me seem different
2 (40.0%)

is not something i want to broadcast openly
2 (40.0%)

is not something i want to broadcast to my "access list" or a "custom filter"
1 (20.0%)

requires mutuality from the other person, i will share only if they share with me
1 (20.0%)

allows me to volunteer them to others
2 (40.0%)

i don't mind people asking if i have out of band preferences, and having a complete form response would be nice
1 (20.0%)

My 225 char annoymous comment on sharing communication channels